Attendees
Agenda
- PA QA clean-up
- Proposal constrain HealthcareService.location 1..1 in PD spec (wait for objections settle this week)
- Search by Endpoint.identifier required api PM/LP - good suggestion; review and settle next time
- VDI - V2 usage; Brett check with Jared
- (PM) require support for endpoint identifier search (direct lookup of endpoint)
- (JC) au receiving facility usage - discussion and outcome (multiple endpoints)
- (BP) location proximity searching; R4 pre-adopt; discuss
- (PM) support for _has search parameter e.g.
[base]/HealthcareService?active=true&endpoint.payload-type=http://hl7.org.au/fhir/CodeSystem/endpoint-payload-type|http://ns.hl7.org.au/hl7v2/profiles/HL7AU-OO-REF-SIMPLIFIED-201706-L1&endpoint.status=active&_include=HealthcareService:endpoint&_has:PractitionerRole:service:identifier=http://ns.electronichealth.net.au/id/medicare-provider-number|444455AA&_has:PractitionerRole:service:active=true - (PM) Proposal PractitionerRole.healthcareService
- is useful as mustSupport so can get to service information
- (PM) could support _include healthcareservice with practitionerrole
- (KM) seek clarification on the purpose of location.managingOrganisation. According to the base spec, it is “Organization responsible for provisioning and upkeep” – which seems to me like the building owner or building manager. NHSD want to know the organisation responsible for the creation and maintenance of the location information (resource) in the directory. Where should this be recorded?(KM)
- Test Suite
- Other Business
Minutes
- Proposal: constrain HealthcareService.location 1..1 in PD spec BE/JD 11-0-0
- Proposal: Search by Endpoint.identifier included in spec PM/JD 11-0-0
- VDI example
identifier": [
{
"type": {
"coding": [
{
"system": "http://hl7.org.au/fhir/v2/0203",
"code": "VDI",
"display": "Vendor Directory Identifier"
}
],
"text": "NHSD Site Service ID - Legacy"
},
"system": "http://fhir.nhsd.com.au/CodeSystem/nhsdIdentifiers#ssid",
"value": "86289",
"assigner": {
"display": "National Health Services Directory"
}
}
], - directory usage sequence Secure Message Delivery POC
- appropriate approach for receiving facility usage
- Endpoint connection-type + payload-type Extensible
- multiple Endpoints needed for different receiving facilities
- see https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/18-australia/topic/Problem.20with.20au-receivingfacility.20extension
Action items
- BE: endpoints connection-type + payload-type Extensible
- BE: verify all searches in are covered
- BE: Search by Endpoint.identifier included in spec
- BE: HealthcareService.location 1..1 in PD spec
- BE: follow up on other territories for the states ValueSet not needed at this stage
- BE: tracker on core HealthcareService description on scope
- BP/PM: PractiitionerRole.healthcareService and _include - TH action to document the case
- BP moving SMD workflow from confluence to IG
- BE use status/active on all profiles and support search by status