Created by Reuben Daniels, last modified by Craig Bayley on 24 Jul, 2018
Date
Attendees
Tim Blake (TB)
Reuben Daniels (RD)
Danielle Tavares-Rixon (DTR)
Clinton Hart (CH)
Brett Esler (BE)
Kate Ebrill (KE)
Michael Bainbridge (MB)
Craig Bayley (CB)
Paul Dajuk (PD)
Nichol Hill (NH)
Saul Lethbridge (SB)
Richard Edwards (RE)
Catherine Resnick (CR)
Jaymee Murdoch (JM)
Richard Townley O'Neil (RTO)
Steve Badham (SB)
Francis Gillett (FG)
Apologies
Joanne Fisher (JF)
Brendan Walker (BW)
David Humphreys (DH)
Previous Actions
Item
Notes
BE to follow up on when balloting of AU Base will happen.
Subject to tooling and a formalised balloting process being developed by HL7 Australia:
A version of the AU base IG will be produced for QA/Review by the HL7 Australia working groups towards having a version being available by HIC 2018
Then provided to broader HL7 Australia membership towards balloting
Once comments are addressed, a final approved version will be published by HL7 Australia for use in other Australian Implementation Guides.
A balloting process is in the works
Discussion items
Item
Who
Notes
Child Health & Development Checks Analysis for Harmonisation
FG
FG presented an overview of the harmonisation document
TB noted that just because fields are in medium or low usage, that does not preclude them from being included in the informatics models being created in the Child Health WG
RD queried whether we would be able to go back to the expert group to ensure our FHIR modelling maintains the intent of the harmonisation work. Response was that follow-up would be desirable and should be possible.
RTO queried whether we have any information on completed books.
TB queried who captures the information. Responses from FG:
health assessments generally captured by providers.
consumer's complete information regarding development milestones which is later checked by providers.
CR commented regarding IP restrictions around ages and stages
Action items
None.
Comments:
Thanks for the meeting minutes. I support Tim's comment regarding field usage, for example something like birth complications do not occur very often, but when it does, it is extremely important to capture that information (to guide clinical treatment post birth for mother and child and clinical considerations for subsequent pregnancies and labours). I was concerned that the low use category would not be included (included in what?) unless a good case is made.
Posted by joanne.fisher at 20 Jul, 2018 14:24